3.5 Wet Chemical Etching
Etching process, like metalisation, is an integral part of fabricating semiconductor devices on wafers with epitaxially grown active layers. These vertically stacked layers have to be defined by mesa etching in order to make contacts to underlying layers or simply to electrically isolate a working device to restrict undesirable leakage currents. In addition, certain metals and compounds can also be defined by etching after deposition. Chemical etching is one of the more convenient ways of achieving this. Table 3.2 lists a host of chemical solutions which were used in the course of this work for various device fabrications; a more comprehensive list of etching solutions is available in [110].
Table 3.2: List of chemical solutions and their approximate etch rates for wet etching various
materials used in the course of this study. Unless otherwise stated, all rates correspond to a
20 °C and 60% humidity ambient conditions.
In its simplest mode, chemical etching involves the dissolution of the material without any
change in the chemical nature of the dissolved species. Factors affecting etch rates include
temperature, humidity, strength of the etching solution as well as the morphology and the
cleanliness of the surface being etched. In addition, given the tendency of different
crystallographic planes to etch at dissimilar rates, various orientations of single-crystal
substrates may etch very differently in a given etchant [111]. An example is GaAs in ammonia
solution (8NH3 : 3H2O2 : 400H2O) which is therefore referred to as an isotropic etchant in
this case.
In this study, wherever possible all etching was carried out in a controlled environment with
known temperature and humidity. The samples were cleaned thoroughly in organic solvents
to remove surface contaminants in steps prior to etching.
One of the more difficult steps in the fabrication of Al0.3Ga0.7As/GaAs HBTs is reaching the
thin base (usually 1000Å or less) and leaving enough material for a good ohmic contact; a
schematic of the processing steps involved is given in section 3.11.
Although selective etching
techniques (involving KI + I2 + H2O) can be used to minimise the risk, it is inapplicable where
the Al mole fraction is less than 40% [112]. Selective etching
is a process which refers to
difference in etch rates between different materials. Thus to etch these Al0.3Ga0.7As/GaAs
HBTs the ammonia solution was used and the etching had to be carefully monitored.
Estimated doping levels monitored from breakdown voltage of the surface layer were used as
a guide. These aspects are further discussed in section 3.7.
Etching InGaP/GaAs or InP/InGaAs wafers is relatively simple as a selective etching solution
is readily applicable. InGaP only etches in conc. HCl (dilute solution is ineffective) which does
not attack GaAs while the ammonia solution does not etch InGaP. Similarly, the respective
etchants for InP and InGaAs listed in Table 3.2 do not etch the other
material. Although it is difficult to quantify the etch rates of InGaP in conc. HCl or InP in
ortho-phosphorous acid (1HCl : 1H3PO4), it was found that approximately 1000Å of both
these materials can be removed in 10 sec. in the respective etching solutions.
In the fabrication of GaAs based Schottky diodes, given the large thickness involved (several
mm in total), the ammonia solution was used for etching to the highly doped substrate. Both
breakdown voltage and Talystep was used for judging the depth of the etch. The HF (1HF :
1H2O2 : 10H2O) solution was also used in cases where etch depth was not very critical such
as in the isolation of TLM mesas consisting of thin conductive layers over thick SI substrates.
Material
Etching Solution
Etch Rate
[Å/sec]
GaAs
8NH3 : 3H2O2 : 400H2O (isotropic)
1H2SO4 : 1H2O2 : 30H2O
1HF : 1H2O2 : 10H2O
30
60
80
AlGaAs
8NH3 : 3H2O2 : 400H2O
1H2SO4 : 1H2O2 : 30H2O
1HF : 1H2O2 : 10H2O
25
60
80
InGaP
conc. HCl
Fast
InP
1HCl : 1H3PO4
Fast
InGaAs
1H2SO4 : 1H2O2 : 20H2O
30
ITO
1HCl : 1H2O
1HF : 1H2O2 : 10H2O
8
125
Al
conc. KOH (at 30°C)
10
In
1HCl : 5H2O
Fast
© 1998: Shabbir A. Bashar (in accordance with paragraph 8.2d, University of London
Regulations for the Degrees of M.Phil. and Ph.D., October 1997). The Copyright of
this thesis rests with the author, and no quotation from it or information derived
from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author.
Title
Dedication
Acknowledgements
Abstract
Symbols
Contents
This page is hosted by Dr. Shabbir A. Bashar,
e-mail: shabbir@betelco.com